|
Why is the Human Rights Watch Academic Freedom Committee not watching Italy? Domenico Pacitti replies to Giuseppe D. in Messina Dear
Domenico, I am a student of social sciences at the Università degli
Studi di Messina in Sicily. I do not give my full name to protect
myself from retorsions but hope you can answer my letter. Our
Italian newspapers, but also foreign newspapers, have reported
that our university has been managed by the Mafia for 25 years and
we have many problems because of this. Your article [Firm
grip of corruption] about our university was published when I was still at
school but I discovered it when I came to university in Messina
where it is still circulated in Italian translation. NevertheIess,
I am sorry to tell you that your article didn’t succeed in
changing anything here. We took courage last year when JUST
Response appealed for international help and collaboration to put
pressures on Italian universities to change but still nothing is
happening and we heard no more about this appeal. Do you have more
news about this and who exactly were the people you asked for
help? –– Giuseppe D., Messina, Italy Dear Giuseppe, I am sorry but hardly surprised to hear that the University
of Messina is still being run by Mafia, but that does not mean we
should give up our efforts to improve the situation. I remember that
article well and have never forgotten those people I met who showed
great courage in speaking out. More Italian students and academics
should follow their example. The appeal you mention [Appeal] did not refer specifically to the University of Messina. It
referred to the well-known case of David Aliaga, a Canadian who was
denied his doctorate degree in circumstances which appeared to
suggest a sort of examiners’ vendetta against him for having had
the audacity to stand up for his rights. But the appeal went well
beyond the Aliaga case in that it spotlighted widespread endemic
corruption within the Italian university system, which obviously
includes the University of Messina, and which covers a multitude of
sins. To take just one example, deep-rooted corruption in the
allocation of tenured university posts has been vehemently decried
by no less than the current head of the Italian Senate, Marcello
Pera [Italy
plagued by Mafia-style universities]. We outlined these and other relevant facts about Italian
universities to the Human Rights Watch Academic Freedom Committee
and we asked their members to lend their support to a worthy cause
and, as you say, collaborate with us in helping to bring the
necessary pressure to bear on Italy. On July 23 2003, we sent our letter to each of the following
people at Human Rights Watch together with an introductory note: · Thomas Yeh,
Academic Freedom Program Associate · Yolanda
Moses, President of the American Association for Higher Education · Hanna Holborn
Gray, Professor at the University of Chicago · Vartan
Gregorian, President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York · Jonathan
Fanton, President Emeritus of the New School for Social Research · Charles
Young, Chancellor Emeritus of UCLA As far as I know, Mr Yeh is still Academic Freedom Program
Associate and official spokesman, while the others are all co-chairs
of the HRW Academic Freedom Committee. Over six weeks later, having
received no replies, we wrote to all of them again, politely
inviting them to respond. Well, let's say we are still awaiting
their replies. Aliaga did eventually manage to get a statement from Mr Yeh,
who apologised “for not being able to assist [...] in this
matter”. He mentioned time and money limitations and concluded:
“Unfortunately, the Italian university system is not currently a
research priority for Academic Freedom work at Human Rights
Watch.” According to the Human Rights Watch website, the Academic
Freedom Committee’s membership has since at least as far back as
August 17 2000 included the following academics: · Johnetta
Cole, Professor, Emory College · Joel
Connaroe, President, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation · Lord Ralf
Dahrendorf, Governor, London School of Economics · Ariel
Dorfman, Research Professor, Duke University · Thomas
Ehrlich, Senior Scholar, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching · James O.
Freedman, President Emeritus, Dartmouth College · John Kenneth
Galbraith, Professor Emeritus, Harvard University · Bernard
Harleston, Professor, Harvard Graduate School of Education · Alice Stone
Ilchman, President Emerita, Sarah Lawrence College · Stanley N.
Katz, Professor, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University · Nannerl O.
Keohane, President, Duke University · Paul LeClerc,
President, The New York Public Library · Fang Lizhi,
Professor, University of Arizona · Walter E.
Massey, President, Morehouse College · Dr. Krzysztof
Michalski, Professor, Institute for Human Sciences · Rev. Joseph
A. O'Hare, President, Fordham University · L. Jay Oliva,
President, New York University · Yuri Orlov,
Senior Scientist, Cornell University · Frank H.T.
Rhodes, President Emeritus, Cornell University · Neil
Rudenstine, President, Harvard University · George Rupp,
President, Colombia University · Judith R.
Shapiro, President, Barnard College · Michael I.
Sovern, Columbia University School of Law · Chang-Lin
Tien, NEC Distinguished Professor, University of California at
Berkeley So there you have an impressive list
of people, some of whom totally ignored requests for support and
collaboration in combating Italian university corruption, and some
of whom chose to be members of a committee which ignored such
requests. At this point some interesting
questions arise. Are we to assume that all of the above academics
endorse Mr Yeh’s position that “the Italian university system is
not currently a research priority for Academic Freedom work at Human
Rights Watch”? What, one wonders, would be required for it to
become a priority? Dropping an H-bomb on the University of Messina
perhaps? Why is it that universities in so-called advanced western
democracies appear to fall beyond the scope of the Committee’s
investigations? Could there be a strong bias here? If so, to what
extent is it a conscious bias? Or to what extent, like Orwell’s
self-censorship, is it unconscious? Could it be that such
distinguished academics are actively condoning the perversion of
higher education in Italy because of a natural instinct to support
colleagues who are in the same trade? Or does their resolute
inaction rather reflect an embarrassed awareness of similar, though
perhaps less spectacular, irregularities at their own, more
"respectable" universities? Who decides what Human Rights
Watch should be watching and what it shouldn’t be watching? And
who is watching Human Rights Watch? It might well prove rewarding to take these questions seriously and launch some in-depth investigations. –– Domenico Pacitti, August 28 2004 Note: This article was published for the first time by JUST Response on August 28 2004. |