|
Italy's
numismatic Mr Prodi: guru or godfather?
By
Domenico Pacitti
Politics, universities
and the Roman Catholic Church are often held to be Italy's three
greatest scourges, respectively responsible for the promotion of a
Machiavellian mentality, insensitivity to truth and merit as
values and the repression of an independent social and moral
conscience. Together they have helped maintain a long-standing
system, rooted in the Counter-Reformation and reaching back
perhaps even as far back as the late Roman Empire, in which
corruption continues to be not only socially acceptable but also
virtually indispensable for survival.
Like all Italian institutions, including the judiciary and the
police force, they are viewed by many as quite literally mafias,
sharing identical ground rules with the notorious and more
dramatic Sicilian variety, the main difference being that while
the latter eliminates its victims physically, the former tends to
do so psychologically and spiritually. Common to both are the
principle of exchange of favours, gross over-concern with power
and money, a cynical disrespect of the law, strict observance of
the code of silence and the complete disregard of all social and
moral criteria.
History shows that a peculiarly Italian corporative spirit has
always automatically transformed any collective undertaking into
mafia, rendering it impossible for even the most passive
participants to avoid complicity in corruption. The popular saying
"In Italia tutto è mafia" (In Italy everything is
mafia) warns that any resistance to the system would be about as
futile as trying to stem the tide.
Viewed in this light, it is both ironical and perplexing that an
Italian professor-politician (over 40% of Italy's politicians are
university lecturers) with a permissive Christian Democratic
background, should have been unanimously approved on a "soul
for Europe" ticket to take over from an outgoing Commission
accused of fraud, nepotism and mismanagement - activities in which
Italians have traditionally been past masters and of which Mr
Prodi himself has certainly had first-hand experience.
It was the Church which, through the customary channels of
"raccomandazione" (recommendation on the basis of
criteria other than merit), obtained for Mr Prodi his first major
government appointment as industry minister in the later 70s under
the premiership and spiritual guidance of Giulio Andreotti. Mr
Andreotti, who has been Christian Democrat prime minister a record
seven times, is currently standing trial for his alleged
involvement with the Sicilian mafia in the 1979 murder of a
journalist who made him the subject of a damning article. That an
elusive Mr Prodi may have managed to escape Mr Andreotti's
questionable influence is supported by the fact that a number of
letters addressed to Mr Prodi at his own ministry are reported to
have been returned "addressee unknown".
Mr Prodi began to make his presence felt in 1982 when the
Christian Democrat leader, Ciriaco De Mita, another former prime
minister who later faced allegations of corruption, placed him at
the head of Italy's mammoth state holding company, IRI (the
Industrial Reconstruction Institute). When it was decided that he
had failed to fulfil his brief of reducing patronage, inefficiency
and waste, Mr Prodi was sacked but reinstated again for one year
in 1993. During his premiership in 1996, a public prosecutor who
accused him of abuse of office and criminal offences in connection
with exploiting the privatisation of public companies for personal
gain while chairman of IRI was suddenly transferred without
explanation.
The chief private company involved was an economic research
centre, appropriately named Nomisma (numismatics, or coin
collecting), which Mr Prodi founded in his home town of Bologna
and ran together with some one hundred shareholders. Mr Prodi's
company, which the centre-right national daily newspaper Il
Giornale called "a sort of mafia cosca clan", secured
numerous contracts from the Emilia regional council in record time
to produce study reports on topics such as public holidays (£86,000),
the state of research and innovation (£70,000) and the economic
impact of the Italian army (£48,000).
Although these and similar studies are said to have been either
plagiarised or simply thrown together, several were readily
purchased by the Bologna provincial council, which just happened
to be chaired by Vittorio Prodi, Mr Prodi's brother, who in turn
commissioned a Church history of Bologna (£80,000) from another
of Mr Prodi's brothers, Paolo Prodi, a university professor.
Another of Nomisma's clients, the Tobacco Documentation and
Information Centre, had previously been created at the behest of
the Philip Morris company, which subsequently signed lucrative
contracts with the Italian Finance Ministry for the production and
sales of cigarettes in Italy. Mr Prodi's wife too, Flavia
Franzoni, is reported to have performed remunerative part-time
work providing study reports for public institutions (£140,000).
She is also said to have benefited from a deal which privatised a
former school for social assistants.
But Nomisma's biggest single killing was a piece of research on
high speed carried out for the national railways. Netting a cool
£4 million and working out at over £2 per word, it carried such
gems as "The advantage of high speed is speed",
"Speed is greatly appreciated because it saves time",
"Preference for the train is inversely proportionate to
distance from the station: those who live closest to the station
use the train more readily" and "The market value of a
flat whose view across a bay is blocked by an eight-lane flyover
inevitably falls".
A recently published book which courageously names names - always
a perilous practice in Italy - places Mr Prodi's Bologna mafia
high among the country's major power groups. Should a new law be
approved, says its author, Bologna will as European capital of
culture for the year 2000 receive £33 million - £9 million in
the first three years and £24 million over the next twenty years
- in order to encourage restoration work, which would leave the
Prodi family laughing all the way to the bank.
It is an open secret that Mr Prodi obtained his professorship at
the University of Bologna, again, through Church recommendations,
thus forcing a potentially more deserving candidate to wait up to
ten years under the present system for another opportunity, change
career or attempt entry through the usual corrupt means depending
on his or her level of moral integrity. It is sadly indicative
though hardly surprising that in the course of his 25 years of
teaching economics and industrial policy at Bologna, Mr Prodi
never once spoke out against Italy's universities, one of the
country's most criticised mafias, sometimes said to merit the
title of universities only by courtesy and arguably the most
grotesquely corrupt in the civilised world.
Pending the improbable event of his being brought to trial and
convicted of corruption, Mr Prodi seems likely to continue
enjoying his foreign reputation as Italy's honest politician,
rendered more plausible by an ingratiating priestly manner, an
affable nature and an engaging down-to-earth human approach. But
the average Italian remains convinced that Mr Prodi has as much
chance of being morally upright and free of corruption as he has
of being fully immersed in the nearby River Po and stepping out
bone dry.
Within this context Tony Blair's words, "I have always made
it clear that Romano Prodi has all the qualities to be an
excellent president of the Commission", seem decidedly
over-generous and Mr Prodi's robust backing by European Socialists
for a full five-and-a-half year mandate perhaps ill-considered.
Just last month the Socialists argued that Mr Prodi's candidacy
for European elections was morally unacceptable - a fine point
under the circumstances.
Doubtless Mr Blair's judgement is at least partly based on Italy's
successful entry into the European Monetary Union under Mr Prodi's
premiership last year. But as Italy's greatest living historian
and social observer Indro Montanelli has pointed out, whatever the
official records may have shown, there was no legitimate way
that Italy could have brought herself into line with the entry
conditions in such a short term. Only time will tell whether the
Bank of Italy is the one Italian institution miraculously exempt
from a mafia mentality. The real miracle was that Mr Prodi's 55th
post-war government somehow managed to survive for as long as 28
months. This, as it turned out, had little to do with Mr Prodi
himself and much to do with the widespread Italian fear that
failure to enter the EMU would have had disastrous consequences
for Italy, a fear shared also by the Communist Refoundation party
and trade unions which lent Mr Prodi their backing.
As Italy continues to look to Europe for political, economic and
moral salvation, Mr Prodi has had a dream, which he has set down
in the form of a new book published just last month, An Idea of
Europe. "The search for a European soul", he writes,
"is beginning to appear as the dominant problem for the
future of our continent. It is certainly a sign of weakness to
think in terms of a possible future path for Europe's institutions
(the strengthening of Parliament, the resolution for the right of
veto in exceptional cases and the reorganisation of the European
Commission and its powers) while no one is able to dictate to us
the path for the reconstruction of a European soul." But in
the course of a chapter entitled "A Soul for Europe",
which makes copious reference to the Roman Catholic Church, it
emerges fairly clearly that Mr Prodi himself intends to dictate
such a path while at the same time stressing the prior need for a
"great moral revolution".
One might be excused for hoping that in calling for a
"specific mandate by EU leaders for reform", Mr Blair
intends to leave as little initiative as possible for Mr Prodi's
creative capabilities and that he also understands that Italians
can be made to work efficiently and even honestly provided they
are kept under close surveillance.
To many bemused Italians, stunned by Mr Prodi's windfall
appointment but already planning to cash in on it, entrusting Mr
Prodi with the presidency of the European Commission is tantamount
to entrusting the running of a brewery to a chronic alcoholic, the
operation of a casino to an inveterate gambler or the governorship
of the Bank of England to the Sicilian mafia. Fortunately, Italy
is also an unpredictable country of exceptions, where the only
thing that is certain is that nothing is certain. Given the right
conditions, Mr Prodi might even succeed. Should he fail, he can
always confess his sins.
Note:
This article first appeared in Parliament Magazine on
May 17 1999.
|